LogoCOMPLY
Platform Performance — Live Data
0%
Completion RateAcross all deployed modules, 2023–2025
0 min
Avg. Module TimeMedian session length, scenario-based format
0
Audit FailuresZero regulatory findings since 2021

Your current provider can't say this.

01 / Completion Rates

The number that ends every compliance audit conversation. Industry median is 34%. Here is what the gap actually costs.

Traditional Compliance Platforms
Comply
Platform Average32–38% completion across deployed modules (Brandon Hall, 2024)
Platform Average94% completion rate across all active client deployments
Drop-Off PointSlide 3–4 of linear decks — passive scroll triggers exit
Drop-Off PointDecision branch at minute 7 re-engages 89% of at-risk learners
Overdue Rate41% of assigned learners overdue at any 30-day snapshot
Overdue Rate6% overdue rate — automated escalation at 72hrs pre-deadline
Re-take Rate12% re-take rate — mostly forced compliance, not retention
Re-take Rate28% voluntary re-take — learners return to scenario branches

Result

97% completion in 18 days

Meridian deployed Anti-Bribery modules to 340 employees across 4 jurisdictions. Previous provider completion after 90 days: 31%. Comply hit 97% in 18 days with zero IT involvement.

Email gated
02 / Engagement Model

Slide-click-next is not learning. Scenario trees with real consequences are. Here is the structural difference.

Traditional Compliance Platforms
Comply
Learning FormatLinear slide decks with 1–3 knowledge-check questions at end
Learning FormatBranching scenario trees — every decision changes the module path
Consequence DesignWrong answer → "Incorrect. The right answer is C." Continue.
Consequence DesignWrong decision → simulated regulatory finding with cost impact shown
Session Length45–90 minute modules — industry standard "comprehensive" format
Session Length11-minute median — designed for cognitive load, not checkbox coverage
Mobile Completion8% mobile completion — desktop-first layouts break on mobile
Mobile Completion41% of completions on mobile — identical experience, adaptive layout

Result

Knowledge retention +62%

Post-training assessment scores increased from 58% average to 94% after switching from slide-deck format. Thornfield's external auditor noted "demonstrably improved" control environment in 2025 annual review.

Email gated
03 / Jurisdictional Coverage

GDPR in Frankfurt, HIPAA in Houston, Anti-Bribery in Singapore. One platform, correctly localized, not approximate.

Traditional Compliance Platforms
Comply
Regulation Library12–18 generic modules, annual update cycle, one-size content
Regulation Library47 regulation-specific modules updated within 30 days of legislative change
Jurisdiction LocalizationEnglish primary, machine-translated variants, legal review not guaranteed
Jurisdiction Localization12 languages, each with in-jurisdiction legal counsel sign-off per module
Multi-Jurisdiction DeploymentSeparate licenses per region, manual admin to assign correct content
Multi-Jurisdiction DeploymentSingle deployment — IP detection assigns correct jurisdiction module automatically
Regulatory Update SpeedAverage 6.2 months to reflect regulatory changes in module content
Regulatory Update Speed28-day maximum SLA for module updates post-regulatory change

Result

12 jurisdictions, 1 deployment

Vantage covers 1,200 employees across UK, Germany, Singapore, and 9 other jurisdictions. Single admin dashboard. Zero content misassignment incidents since 2022 go-live.

Email gated

Three dimensions reviewed. Two remaining.

Seen enough to start a pilot?

04 / Reporting Dashboard

Compliance officers need evidence, not spreadsheets. The dashboard should be your audit artifact, not a data export job.

Traditional Compliance Platforms
Comply
Report GenerationCSV export → manual pivot table → PDF → email to auditor
Report GenerationOne-click audit-ready PDF: completion, scores, timestamps, IP log
Real-Time VisibilityDashboard updates every 24–48 hours, no push alerts
Real-Time VisibilityLive dashboard — completion events post within 90 seconds, Slack/email alerts
At-Risk IdentificationManual review of completion lists to identify non-completers
At-Risk IdentificationAutomated at-risk flagging — non-starters, slow progress, repeated failures
Audit Trail IntegritySession logs in LMS database — requires IT extraction for audit
Audit Trail IntegrityImmutable audit log with digital signature — directly shareable with regulators

Result

Audit prep time: 3 weeks → 4 hours

Harwick's compliance team previously spent 3 weeks preparing evidence packs for FCA review. With Comply's one-click audit export, the 2025 review pack was assembled in 4 hours. Zero findings.

Email gated
05 / Pricing Transparency

Hidden per-module fees, annual true-up surprises, and seat-count minimums are compliance platform standard practice. Not here.

Traditional Compliance Platforms
Comply
Pricing ModelPer-seat annual license + per-module content fees + implementation fee
Pricing ModelPer-active-learner pricing — pay only for employees who actually complete
Content AccessModule library sold in bundles — full library requires enterprise tier
Content AccessFull 47-module library included at every tier, no content upsells
Implementation Cost$8,000–$25,000 implementation fee, 6–12 week onboarding
Implementation CostZero implementation fee — first module live in under 2 hours
Contract Terms3-year minimum contract, 90-day cancellation notice, auto-renewal
Contract TermsMonth-to-month available from day one — annual discount optional

Result

43% lower total cost vs prior vendor

Castlebrook's 3-year TCO comparison: previous vendor $312,000 including implementation, content bundles, and true-up charges. Comply equivalent period: $178,000. Same coverage, 3x better completion.

Email gated

Five dimensions. One conclusion.

THE GAP IS
MEASURABLE.

Completion rates. Engagement depth. Jurisdictional accuracy. Reporting clarity. Pricing honesty. Every dimension has a number. Your current provider has the other number.

No credit card. No sales call required. Pilot runs in parallel with your current provider.